In practice, count data may exhibit varying dispersion patterns and excessive zero values; additionally, they may appear in groups or clusters sharing a common source of variation. We present a novel Bayesian approach for analyzing such data. To model these features, we combine the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson distribution, which allows both overdispersion and underdispersion, with a hurdle component for the zeros and random effects for clustering. We propose an efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling scheme to obtain posterior inference from our model. Through simulation studies, we compare our hurdle Conway-Maxwell-Poisson model with a hurdle Poisson model to demonstrate the effectiveness of our Conway-Maxwell-Poisson approach. Furthermore, we apply our model to analyze an illustrative dataset containing information on the number and types of carious lesions on each tooth in a population of 9-year-olds from the Iowa Fluoride Study, which is an ongoing longitudinal study on a cohort of Iowa children that began in 1991.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#19,247,126
of 24,508,104 outputs
Outputs from Statistics in Medicine
#2,832
of 4,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,585
of 336,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistics in Medicine
#28
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,508,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,014 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
