↓ Skip to main content

Bioequivalence of a Liquid Formulation of Alpha1-Proteinase Inhibitor Compared with Prolastin®-C (Lyophilized Alpha1-PI) in Alpha1-Antitrypsin Deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bioequivalence of a Liquid Formulation of Alpha1-Proteinase Inhibitor Compared with Prolastin®-C (Lyophilized Alpha1-PI) in Alpha1-Antitrypsin Deficiency
Published in
COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2017
DOI 10.1080/15412555.2017.1376044
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study evaluated the bioequivalence, safety, and immunogenicity of a new liquid formulation of human plasma-derived alpha1-proteinase inhibitor, Liquid Alpha1-PI, compared with the Lyophilized Alpha1-PI formulation (Prolastin®-C), for augmentation therapy in patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). In this double-blind, randomized, 20-week crossover study, 32 subjects with AATD were randomized to receive 8 weekly infusions of 60 mg/kg of Liquid Alpha1-PI or Lyophilized Alpha1-PI. Serial blood samples were drawn for 7 days after the last dose followed by 8 weeks of the alternative treatment. The primary endpoint was bioequivalence at steady state, as measured by area under the concentration versus time curve from 0 to 7 days (AUC0-7 days) postdose using an antigenic content assay. Bioequivalence was defined as 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio of the geometric least squares (LS) mean of AUC0-7 days for both products within the limits of 0.80 and 1.25. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed. Mean alpha1-PI concentration versus time curves for both formulations were superimposable. Mean AUC0-7 days was 20 320 versus 19 838 mg × h/dl for Liquid Alpha1-PI and Lyophilized Alpha1-PI, respectively. The LS mean ratio of AUC0-7 days (90% CI) for Liquid Alpha1-PI versus Lyophilized Alpha1-PI was 1.05 (1.03-1.08), indicating bioequivalence. Liquid Alpha1-PI was well tolerated and adverse events were consistent with Lyophilized Alpha1-PI. Immunogenicity to either product was not detected. In conclusion, Liquid Alpha1-PI is bioequivalent to Lyophilized Alpha1-PI, with a similar safety profile. The liquid formulation would eliminate the need for reconstitution and shorten preparation time for patients receiving augmentation therapy for AATD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Other 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,007,525
of 27,521,961 outputs
Outputs from COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#225
of 701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,251
of 337,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,521,961 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.