↓ Skip to main content

Expectations and final evaluation of complete dentures by patients, dentist and dental technician

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Expectations and final evaluation of complete dentures by patients, dentist and dental technician
Published in
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, February 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02072.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. R. M. Z. MARACHLIOGLOU, J. F. F. DOS SANTOS, V. P. P. CUNHA, L. MARCHINI

Abstract

There is a poor association between the dentist's evaluation of denture quality and patients' satisfaction with their dentures. Possible differences between dental professionals and patients' expectations might help explain differences in outcome evaluations. This study compared scores given by a dentist, a dental technician and patients for their expectations before and their final evaluation after complete dentures treatment. Twenty completely edentulous patients, a prosthodontist and a dental technician provided scores for the expected aesthetic and functional results of their dentures based on a visual analogue scale at baseline. Post-treatment completion ratings were given after adjustments, by dentist and patients. The dental technician provided post-treatment completion ratings after completing the dentures. The patients had higher expectations than the dental technician and the dentist perceived for both aesthetic and function (P < 0.001). The patients also presented higher post-treatment completion ratings than the dental professionals perceived for final aesthetics (P = 0.016, Kendall's W = 0.207) and function (P = 0.002, Kendall's W = 0.303). Only the dentist presented a statistically significant difference between expectations (lower) and final (higher) outcomes for aesthetics (P = 0.017) and function (P = 0.003). There was no correlation between expectations and post-treatment completion ratings according to the patients' age. There was also no correlation between the patients' gender and expectation scores. Patients presented higher expectations regarding their dentures than dental professionals. The dentist believed that dentures would bring fewer benefits than patients did, but his perception of denture benefits post-treatment was significantly higher than his expectations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Egypt 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 95 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 55%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2014.
All research outputs
#5,875,378
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
#188
of 1,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,681
of 93,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.