↓ Skip to main content

Integrated Genomic Analyses in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatrics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Integrated Genomic Analyses in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Published in
Journal of Pediatrics, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.09.052
Pubmed ID
Authors

Namasivayam Ambalavanan, C. Michael Cotten, Grier P. Page, Waldemar A. Carlo, Jeffrey C. Murray, Soumyaroop Bhattacharya, Thomas J. Mariani, Alain C. Cuna, Ona M. Faye-Petersen, David Kelly, Rosemary D. Higgins, Genomics and Cytokine Subcommittees of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network

Abstract

To identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and pathways associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) because O2 requirement at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age risk is strongly influenced by heritable factors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 31 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2015.
All research outputs
#24,256,044
of 34,563,371 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#12,656
of 15,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,250
of 309,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#82
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,563,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.