↓ Skip to main content

Mechanism of the Polymerization of rac-Lactide by Fast Zinc Alkoxide Catalysts

Overview of attention for article published in Inorganic Chemistry, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanism of the Polymerization of rac-Lactide by Fast Zinc Alkoxide Catalysts
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, November 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02544
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The ring-opening transesterification polymerization (ROTEP) of rac-lactide (rac-LA) using L(X)Zn catalysts (L(X) = ligand having phenolate, amine, and pyridine donors with variable para substituents X on the bound phenolate donor; X = NO2, Br, t-Bu, OMe) was evaluated through kinetics experiments and density functional theory, with the aim of determining how electronic modulation of the ligand framework influences polymerization rate, selectivity, and control. After determination that zinc-ethyl precatalysts required 24 h of reaction with benzyl alcohol to convert to active alkoxide complexes, the subsequently formed species proved to be active and fairly selective, polymerizing up to 300 equiv of rac-LA in 6-10 min while yielding isotactic (Pm = 0.72-0.78) polylactide (PLA) with low dispersities: Đ = 1.06-1.17. In contrast to previous work with aluminum catalysts for which electronic effects of ligand substituents were significant (Hammett ρ = +1.2-1.4), the L(X)Zn systems exhibited much less of an effect (ρ = +0.3). Density functional calculations revealed details of the initiation and propagation steps, enabling insights into the high isotacticity and the insensitivity of the rate on the identity of X.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 33%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 34 74%
Computer Science 2 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,742,382
of 26,796,023 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#5,569
of 25,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,362
of 347,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#64
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,796,023 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.