↓ Skip to main content

Improved Contact Predictions Using the Recognition of Protein Like Contact Patterns

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Improved Contact Predictions Using the Recognition of Protein Like Contact Patterns
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003889
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Given sufficient large protein families, and using a global statistical inference approach, it is possible to obtain sufficient accuracy in protein residue contact predictions to predict the structure of many proteins. However, these approaches do not consider the fact that the contacts in a protein are neither randomly, nor independently distributed, but actually follow precise rules governed by the structure of the protein and thus are interdependent. Here, we present PconsC2, a novel method that uses a deep learning approach to identify protein-like contact patterns to improve contact predictions. A substantial enhancement can be seen for all contacts independently on the number of aligned sequences, residue separation or secondary structure type, but is largest for β-sheet containing proteins. In addition to being superior to earlier methods based on statistical inferences, in comparison to state of the art methods using machine learning, PconsC2 is superior for families with more than 100 effective sequence homologs. The improved contact prediction enables improved structure prediction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 158 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 30%
Researcher 29 17%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 22%
Computer Science 35 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 20%
Physics and Astronomy 11 7%
Chemistry 10 6%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 23 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,321,240
of 33,953,699 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,072
of 10,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,390
of 306,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#44
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,953,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.