↓ Skip to main content

From false belief to friendship: Commentary on Fink, Begeer, Peterson, Slaughter, and de Rosnay

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Developmental Psychology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
From false belief to friendship: Commentary on Fink, Begeer, Peterson, Slaughter, and de Rosnay
Published in
British Journal of Developmental Psychology, November 2014
DOI 10.1111/bjdp.12070
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Fink, Begeer, Peterson, Slaughter, and de Rosnay (2014) represent a welcome contribution in providing empirical evidence of the link from false belief understanding at Time 1 to mutual friendship 2 years later, controlling for several other possible contributors. This opens a new and important line of inquiry into the practical significance of a Theory of Mind. As is typical of pioneering research, further study is needed to address some issues; here, we point out some of these issues and then briefly discuss the broader implications of Fink et al.'s findings.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Portugal 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 16 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2014.
All research outputs
#16,691,248
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Developmental Psychology
#470
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,107
of 268,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Developmental Psychology
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.