↓ Skip to main content

Responses of Pigeon (Columba livia) Wulst Neurons During Acquisition and Reversal of a Visual Discrimination Task

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Neuroscience, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Responses of Pigeon (Columba livia) Wulst Neurons During Acquisition and Reversal of a Visual Discrimination Task
Published in
Behavioral Neuroscience, October 2008
DOI 10.1037/a0012586
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The avian visual "Wulst" is a target of the ascending thalamofugal visual pathway. In pigeons (Columba livia), lesion damage to the Wulst has little effect on simple visual discriminations, but impairs performance on tasks such as reversal learning. We recorded the responses of single Wulst neurons as pigeons were trained on the acquisition and subsequent reversal of a visual discrimination. Of the 64 units recorded, 54 (84%) displayed a significant difference in firing rate between some component of the task and the intertrial interval that separated trials. More important, 14 units (22%) displayed a significant change in firing rate exclusively to the S+ and/or S- as learning progressed either during acquisition or reversal. The responses of these 14 neurons indicate that learning during initial acquisition was as likely to correlate with a change in firing rate as during reversal, and some neuronal responses could be characterized as representing reward properties together with visual stimulus features. As such, responses of pigeon Wulst neurons indicate a role in representing aspects of learning as much as the physical/perceptual properties of visual stimuli.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Portugal 1 4%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 22 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 28%
Student > Master 4 16%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 56%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Psychology 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Neuroscience
#314
of 3,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,805
of 101,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Neuroscience
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them