↓ Skip to main content

Geographic variation in inhaled corticosteroid use for children with persistent asthma in Medicaid

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asthma, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Geographic variation in inhaled corticosteroid use for children with persistent asthma in Medicaid
Published in
Journal of Asthma, September 2017
DOI 10.1080/02770903.2017.1362428
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Geographic variation in the rates of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use for children with persistent asthma in Medicaid has been reported, but the source of the variation is unknown. The objective of this study was to quantify the geographic variation in ICS use for children with persistent asthma in Medicaid that remains after adjusting for the characteristics of children in an area. Data from the 2005-2007 Medicaid Analytic eXtract files were used. Frequent fills of short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA) were used to identify children 5-18 years old with persistent asthma across the United States. A child was considered to have used an ICS if the child initially filled an ICS following frequent SABA use. Areas were determined using published methods, and the unadjusted ICS rate and the area treatment ratio for ICS, which adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, were calculated for each area. Of 15,917 children, 13% used an ICS. The median unadjusted ICS rate for all areas was 10% but ranged from 0-64%. ICS use was less than expected for more than half of the areas based on the characteristics of the children in the area, but use was nearly five times what was expected in some areas. Areas with higher than expected ICS use were found contiguous to areas with lower than expected use. Geographic variation in ICS not attributable to the demographic and clinical characteristics of the children in an area exists and could prove useful in the struggle to reduce asthma exacerbation rates.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,576,001
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma
#1,687
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,074
of 315,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma
#24
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.