↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of Defective PS Recognition and Efferocytosis to Chronic Inflammation and Autoimmunity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Contribution of Defective PS Recognition and Efferocytosis to Chronic Inflammation and Autoimmunity
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00566
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The rapid and efficient clearance of apoptotic cells results in the elimination of auto-antigens and provides a strong anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive signal to prevent autoimmunity. While professional and non-professional phagocytes utilize a wide array of surface receptors to recognize apoptotic cells, the recognition of phosphatidylserine (PS) on apoptotic cells by PS receptors on phagocytes is the emblematic signal for efferocytosis in metazoans. PS-dependent efferocytosis is associated with the production of anti-inflammatory factors such as IL-10 and TGF-β that function, in part, to maintain tolerance to auto-antigens. In contrast, when apoptotic cells fail to be recognized and processed for degradation, auto-antigens persist, such as self-nucleic acids, which can trigger immune activation leading to autoantibody production and autoimmunity. Despite the fact that genetic mouse models clearly demonstrate that loss of PS receptors can lead to age-dependent auto-immune diseases reminiscent of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the link between PS and defective clearance in chronic inflammation and human autoimmunity is not well delineated. In this perspective, we review emerging questions developing in the field that may be of relevance to SLE and human autoimmunity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 87 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Master 11 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2014.
All research outputs
#31,339,694
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#36,323
of 44,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,200
of 305,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#168
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.