↓ Skip to main content

Type I Interferon Is the Primary Regulator of Inducible Ly-6C Expression on T Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research, August 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Type I Interferon Is the Primary Regulator of Inducible Ly-6C Expression on T Cells
Published in
Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research, August 2001
DOI 10.1089/10799900152547885
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ly-6C has been proposed as a marker of memory CD8+ T cells. Reports have indicated that Ly-6C is upregulated after T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation or exposure to proinflammatory cytokines. This study examined the relative roles of proinflammatory cytokines and TCR engagement in Ly-6C induction. In vitro experiments tested the effects of cytokines on Ly-6C expression and confirmed interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) as a primary cytokine that induces Ly-6C expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The amount and duration of Ly-6C expression were examined on T cells after in vivo induction of proinflammatory cytokines (CpG oligodeoxynucleotides [ODN]) or TCR activation (staphylococcal enterotoxin B [SEB]). In vivo, proinflammatory cytokines transiently upregulated Ly-6C on T cells in the absence of TCR stimulation. TCR stimulation by SEB transiently upregulated Ly-6C expression on antigen-specific and antigen-nonspecific T cells but did not cause long-term upregulation of Ly-6C expression in either population. IFN-alpha was confirmed as a primary inducer of Ly-6C in vivo, as CpG ODN were unable to induce Ly-6C expression in IFN-alphaRI(-/-) mice. Thus, inducible Ly-6C expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells is largely due to IFN-alpha in the environment and appears not to be directly correlated with the development of T cell memory.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 33%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 5 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2013.
All research outputs
#12,059,174
of 33,924,920 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research
#471
of 1,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,017
of 58,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,924,920 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.