↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of four streamflow record extension techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Water Resources Research, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of four streamflow record extension techniques
Published in
Water Resources Research, July 2010
DOI 10.1029/wr018i004p01081
Authors

Robert M. Hirsch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Malaysia 1 1%
Unknown 87 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 34%
Researcher 15 17%
Other 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 26%
Engineering 21 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1994.
All research outputs
#8,160,367
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#1,955
of 5,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,804
of 98,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#252
of 988 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 988 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.