↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Mercury hazards from gold mining to humans, plants, and animals.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Mercury hazards from gold mining to humans, plants, and animals.
Chapter number 4
Book title
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Published in
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2004
DOI 10.1007/0-387-21733-9_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-387-20519-9, 978-0-387-21733-8
Authors

Eisler R, Eisler, Ronald

Abstract

Mercury contamination of the environment from historical and ongoing mining practices that rely on mercury amalgamation for gold extraction is widespread. Contamination was particularly severe in the immediate vicinity of gold extraction and refining operations; however, mercury, especially in the form of water-soluble methylmercury, may be transported to pristine areas by rainwater, water currents, deforestation, volatilization, and other vectors. Examples of gold mining-associated mercury pollution have been shown for Canada, the U.S., Africa, China, the Philippines, Siberia, and South America. In parts of Brazil, for example, mercury concentrations in all abiotic materials, plants, and animals, including endangered species of mammals and reptiles, collected near ongoing mercury amalgamation gold mining sites were far in excess of allowable mercury levels promulgated by regulatory agencies for the protection of human health and natural resources. Although health authorities in Brazil are unable to detect conclusive evidence of human mercury intoxication, the potential exists in the absence of mitigation for epidemic mercury poisoning of the mining population and environs. In the U.S., environmental mercury contamination is mostly from historical gold mining practices, and portions of Nevada remain sufficiently mercury contaminated to pose a hazard to reproduction of carnivorous fishes and fish-eating birds. Concentrations of total mercury lethal to sensitive representative natural resources range from 0.1 to 2.0 microg/L of medium for aquatic organisms; from 2,200 to 31,000 microg/kg BW (acute oral) and from 4,000 to 40,000 microg/kg (dietary) for birds; and from 100 to 500 microg/kg BW (daily dose) and from 1,000 to 5,000 microg/kg diet for mammals. Significant adverse sublethal effects were observed among selected aquatic species at water concentrations of 0.03-0.1 microg Hg/L. For some birds, adverse effects, mainly on reproduction, have been associated with total mercury concentrations (microg/kg FW) of 5,000 in feathers, 900 in eggs, and 50-100 in diet, and with daily intakes of 640 microg/kg BW. Sensitive nonhuman mammals showed significant adverse effects of mercury when daily intakes were 250 microg/kg BW, when dietary levels were 1,100 microg/kg, or when tissue concentrations exceeded 1,100 microg/kg. Proposed mercury criteria for protection of aquatic life range from 0.012 microg/L for freshwater life to 0.025 microg/L for marine life; for birds, less than 100 microg/kg diet FW; and for small mammals, less than 1,100 microg/kg FW diet. All these proposed criteria provide, at best, minimal protection.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 96 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 30%
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Other 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 32 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Engineering 8 8%
Chemistry 8 8%
Other 30 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,726,873
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#62
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,178
of 138,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.