↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for International Gambling Harm-Minimisation Guidelines: Comparison with Effective Public Health Policy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Recommendations for International Gambling Harm-Minimisation Guidelines: Comparison with Effective Public Health Policy
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10899-013-9389-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Problem gambling represents a significant public health problem, however, research on effective gambling harm-minimisation measures lags behind other fields, including other addictive disorders. In recognition of the need for consistency between international jurisdictions and the importance of basing policy on empirical evidence, international conventions exist for policy on alcohol, tobacco, and illegal substances. This paper examines the evidence of best practice policies to provide recommendations for international guidelines for harm-minimisation policy for gambling, including specific consideration of the specific requirements for policies on Internet gambling. Evidence indicates that many of the public health policies implemented for addictive substances can be adapted to address gambling-related harms. Specifically, a minimum legal age of at least 18 for gambling participation, licensing of gambling venues and activities with responsible gambling and consumer protection strategies mandated, and brief interventions should be available for those at-risk for and experiencing gambling-related problems. However, there is mixed evidence on the effectiveness of limits on opening hours and gambling venue density and increased taxation to minimise harms. Given increases in trade globalisation and particularly the global nature of Internet gambling, it is recommended that jurisdictions take actions to harmonise gambling public health policies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 171 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 20%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 19%
Social Sciences 32 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 51 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2017.
All research outputs
#10,260,781
of 29,606,669 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#466
of 1,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,993
of 220,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,606,669 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.