↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 18,094)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
430 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Classification of Cough as a Symptom in Adults and Management Algorithms CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report
Published in
CHEST, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2017.10.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard S. Irwin, Cynthia L. French, Anne B. Chang, Kenneth W. Altman, CHEST Expert Cough Panel*, Todd M. Adams, Kenneth W. Altman, Elie Azoulay, Alan F. Barker, Surinder S. Birring, Fiona Blackhall, Donald C. Bolser, Louis-Philippe Boulet, Christopher Brightling, Priscilla Callahan-Lyon, Anne B. Chang, Terrie Cowley, Satoru Ebihara, Ali A. El Solh, Patricio Escalante, Stephen K. Field, Dina Fisher, Cynthia T. French, Peter Gibson, Philip Gold, Susan M. Harding, Anthony Harnden, Adam T. Hill, Richard S. Irwin, Joanne Kavanagh, Karina A. Keogh, Kefang Lai, Andrew P. Lane, Kaiser Lim, J. Mark Madison, Mark A. Malesker, Stuart Mazzone, Alex Molassoitis, M. Hassan Murad, Mangala Narasimhan, Huong Q. Nguyen, Peter Newcombe, John Oppenheimer, Marcos I. Restrepo, Mark Rosen, Bruce Rubin, Jay H. Ryu, Susan M. Tarlo, Julie Turmel, Anne E. Vertigan, Gang Wang, Miles Weinberger

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 430 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 37 9%
Student > Master 36 8%
Student > Bachelor 35 8%
Student > Postgraduate 34 8%
Researcher 25 6%
Other 78 18%
Unknown 185 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 149 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 32 7%
Unknown 197 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 491. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2026.
All research outputs
#68,153
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#20
of 18,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,124
of 373,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#1
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.