↓ Skip to main content

Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy: barriers to translation into clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Review of Medical Devices, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy: barriers to translation into clinical practice
Published in
Expert Review of Medical Devices, January 2014
DOI 10.1586/erd.09.76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 120 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Other 6 5%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 41 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 26%
Engineering 17 13%
Computer Science 15 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 40 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,483,026
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Medical Devices
#430
of 712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,003
of 306,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Medical Devices
#164
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.