You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Concentration With Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2017.17488 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew R. Chapman, Kuan Ken Lee, David A. McAllister, Louise Cullen, Jaimi H. Greenslade, William Parsonage, Andrew Worster, Peter A. Kavsak, Stefan Blankenberg, Johannes Neumann, Nils A. Söerensen, Dirk Westermann, Madelon M. Buijs, Gerard J. E. Verdel, John W. Pickering, Martin P. Than, Raphael Twerenbold, Patrick Badertscher, Zaid Sabti, Christian Mueller, Atul Anand, Philip Adamson, Fiona E. Strachan, Amy Ferry, Dennis Sandeman, Alasdair Gray, Richard Body, Brian Keevil, Edward Carlton, Kim Greaves, Frederick K. Korley, Thomas S. Metkus, Yader Sandoval, Fred S. Apple, David E. Newby, Anoop S. V. Shah, Nicholas L. Mills |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 232 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 44 | 19% |
| United States | 43 | 19% |
| Colombia | 10 | 4% |
| Spain | 7 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 2% |
| India | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 69 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 140 | 60% |
| Scientists | 47 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 39 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 266 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 20% |
| Unknown | 89 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Unknown | 100 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 367. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2026.
All research outputs
#109,904
of 34,563,371 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1,773
of 42,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,041
of 493,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#42
of 410 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,563,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 410 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.