You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tsunami vertical-evacuation planning in the U.S. Pacific Northwest as a geospatial, multi-criteria decision problem
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.04.009 |
Authors |
Nathan Wood, Jeanne Jones, John Schelling, Mathew Schmidtlein |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 153 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 20% |
Student > Master | 28 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
Researcher | 13 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 4% |
Other | 30 | 19% |
Unknown | 34 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 39 | 25% |
Environmental Science | 24 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 11% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 8% |
Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 19 | 12% |
Unknown | 41 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,187,872
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
#110
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,290
of 237,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.