↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of WIC Food Package Changes on Access to Healthful Food in 2 Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Impact of WIC Food Package Changes on Access to Healthful Food in 2 Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods
Published in
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, March 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.08.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To evaluate the impact of the 2009 food package changes for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) on the availability of healthful food.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 144 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 21%
Researcher 30 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 48 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,301,341
of 34,251,523 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
#265
of 1,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,546
of 203,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,251,523 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.