↓ Skip to main content

Sudden death in a patient with bone marrow transplant by a fungus among us

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Case Reports, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sudden death in a patient with bone marrow transplant by a fungus among us
Published in
BMJ Case Reports, November 2014
DOI 10.1136/bcr-2014-207403
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mucormycosis is rare, presenting as breakthrough infection among haematological and transplant patients on prophylaxis with voriconazole. We report an unusual presentation of this infection, that which is pneumonia progressing to cardiac arrest. A 68-year-old woman with refractory acute myelogenous leukaemia on voriconazole prophylaxis was initially admitted for neutropenic fever and pneumonia. She was discharged improved on antibiotics and voriconazole for presumed aspergillosis. She returned after 1 month with the same presentation. She eventually improved on antibiotics and voriconazole, and eventually received bone marrow transplantation. Three days later, she developed pleuritic chest pain, dyspnoea, and hypoxia requiring intubation. An hour after intubation, the patient arrested and expired. Autopsy revealed Rhizopus pneumonitis with pulmonary infarction, and emboli to her cerebellum, heart, thyroid and kidney. Mucormycosis is an emerging, fatal infection that should be suspected in haematological and transplant patients who deteriorate on voriconazole.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 11 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,731,702
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Case Reports
#5,142
of 8,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,525
of 258,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Case Reports
#91
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.