↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of selenium and type 2 diabetes: Can we make sense of it?

Overview of attention for article published in Free Radical Biology & Medicine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Epidemiology of selenium and type 2 diabetes: Can we make sense of it?
Published in
Free Radical Biology & Medicine, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.04.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The potential of some selenoproteins to protect against oxidative stress led to the expectation that selenium would be protective against type 2 diabetes, and indeed in early in vivo and in vitro studies, selenium (as selenate) was shown to have antidiabetic and insulin-mimetic effects. However, more recently, findings from observational cross-sectional studies have raised concern that high selenium exposure may be associated with type 2 diabetes or insulin resistance, at least in well-nourished populations, though trial results have been inconsistent. Moreover, the largest trials that investigated the effects of selenium supplementation on diabetes endpoints have had cancer prevention as their primary outcome, casting doubt on the interpretation of posthoc analyses. Factors affecting serum/plasma selenium are not just location and level of disease-associated inflammation but the fact that higher concentrations of plasma selenoprotein P yet lower concentrations of glutathione peroxidase are found in type 2 diabetic patients than in normal subjects. From a public health perspective, selenium is marketed as a dietary supplement and is commonly added to multivitamin/mineral preparations that are consumed in many Western countries. Based on current evidence, however, the indiscriminate use of selenium supplements in individuals and populations with adequate-to-high selenium status cannot be justified and may increase risk. In conclusion, although there is a clear link between certain selenoproteins and glucose metabolism or insulin resistance, the relationship between selenium and type 2 diabetes is undoubtedly complex. It is possible that the relationship is U-shaped, with possible harm occurring both below and above the physiological range for optimal activity of some or all selenoproteins.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 141 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 35 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 45 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#11,471,584
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Free Radical Biology & Medicine
#2,688
of 6,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,658
of 226,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Free Radical Biology & Medicine
#23
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.