↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for Choosing a Self-Report Outcome Measure

Overview of attention for article published in Ear and hearing (Print), August 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Guidelines for Choosing a Self-Report Outcome Measure
Published in
Ear and hearing (Print), August 2000
DOI 10.1097/00003446-200008001-00006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A table of available self-report inventories used throughout the world is provided with references for obtaining necessary psychometric data for research or clinical applications. Considerations for choosing an inventory (reliability, validity, and content appropriateness) are discussed and issues related to group versus single-subject applications examined. It is preferable that translation and revalidation of existing outcome measures be considered above developing new ones for international application.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 20 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 22 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#12,345,171
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Ear and hearing (Print)
#775
of 2,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,265
of 56,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ear and hearing (Print)
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.