You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis: Multiple Sources and Global Applications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Reviews of Geophysics, December 2017
|
DOI | 10.1002/2017rg000579 |
Authors |
Anita Grezio, Andrey Babeyko, Maria Ana Baptista, Jörn Behrens, Antonio Costa, Gareth Davies, Eric L. Geist, Sylfest Glimsdal, Frank I. González, Jonathan Griffin, Carl B. Harbitz, Randall J. LeVeque, Stefano Lorito, Finn Løvholt, Rachid Omira, Christof Mueller, Raphaël Paris, Tom Parsons, Jascha Polet, William Power, Jacopo Selva, Mathilde B. Sørensen, Hong Kie Thio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 2 | 22% |
Germany | 2 | 22% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 37 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 16% |
Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
Lecturer | 9 | 4% |
Other | 27 | 13% |
Unknown | 68 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 64 | 31% |
Engineering | 40 | 19% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
Other | 13 | 6% |
Unknown | 74 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,606,024
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Geophysics
#244
of 775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,352
of 454,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Geophysics
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.