↓ Skip to main content

Haemodynamic Recovery Properties of the Torsioned Testicular Artery Lumen

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Haemodynamic Recovery Properties of the Torsioned Testicular Artery Lumen
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-15680-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Testicular artery torsion (twisting) is one such severe vascular condition that leads spermatic cord injury. In this study, we investigate the recovery response of a torsioned ram testicular artery in an isolated organ-culture flow loop with clinically relevant twisting modes (90°, 180°, 270° and 360° angles). Quantitative optical coherence tomography technique was employed to track changes in the lumen diameter, wall thickness and the three-dimensional shape of the vessel in the physiological pressure range (10-50 mmHg). As a control, pressure-flow characteristics of the untwisted arteries were studied when subjected to augmented blood flow conditions with physiological flow rates up to 36 ml/min. Both twist and C-shaped buckling modes were observed. Acute increase in pressure levels opened the narrowed lumen of the twisted arteries noninvasively at all twist angles (at ∼22 mmHg and ∼35 mmHg for 360°-twisted vessels during static and dynamic flow experiments, respectively). The association between the twist-opening flow rate and the vessel diameter was greatly influenced by the initial twist angle. The biomechanical characteristics of the normal (untwisted) and torsioned testicular arteries supported the utilization of blood flow augmentation as an effective therapeutic approach to modulate the vessel lumen and recover organ reperfusion.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 24%
Researcher 4 19%
Professor 3 14%
Other 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,451,991
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#106,249
of 124,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,420
of 325,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3,472
of 4,258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.