↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Revealing Structural Changes of Prion Protein during Conversion from α‑Helical Monomer to β‑Oligomers by Means of ESR and Nanochannel Encapsulation
Published in
ACS Chemical Biology, November 2014
DOI 10.1021/cb500765e
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Under nondenaturing neutral pH conditions, full-length mouse recombinant prion protein lacking the only disulfide bridge can spontaneously convert from an α-helical-dominant conformer (α-state) to a β-sheet-rich conformer (β-state), which then associates into β-oligomers, and the kinetics of this spontaneous conversion depends on the properties of the buffer used. The molecular details of this structural conversion have not been reported due to the difficulty of exploring big protein aggregates. We introduced spin probes into different structural segments (three helices and the loop between strand 1 and helix 1), and employed a combined approach of ESR spectroscopy and protein encapsulation in nanochannels to reveal local structural changes during the α-to-β transition. Nanochannels provide an environment in which prion protein molecules are isolated from each other, but the α-to-β transition can still occur. By measuring dipolar interactions between spin probes during the transition, we showed that helix 1 and helix 3 retained their helicity, while helix 2 unfolded to form an extended structure. Moreover, our pulsed ESR results allowed clear discrimination between the intra- and intermolecular distances between spin labeled residues in helix 2 in the β-oligomers, making it possible to demonstrate that the unfolded helix 2 segment lies at the association interface of the β-oligomers to form cross-β structure.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Taiwan 1 3%
Lithuania 1 3%
Israel 1 3%
Unknown 25 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 38%
Researcher 11 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,383,471
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from ACS Chemical Biology
#2,826
of 3,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,762
of 258,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Chemical Biology
#64
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.