↓ Skip to main content

Enhancement of CD8+ T‐cell memory by removal of a vaccinia virus nuclear factor‐κB inhibitor

Overview of attention for article published in Immunology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Enhancement of CD8+ T‐cell memory by removal of a vaccinia virus nuclear factor‐κB inhibitor
Published in
Immunology, April 2015
DOI 10.1111/imm.12422
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Factors influencing T-cell responses are important for vaccine development but incompletely understood. Here vaccinia virus (VACV) protein N1 is shown to impair the development of both effector and memory CD8(+) T-cells and this correlates with its inhibition of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) activation. Infection with VACVs that either have the N1L gene deleted (vΔN1) or containing an I6E mutation (vN1.I6E) that abrogates its inhibition of NF-κB resulted in increased central and memory CD8(+) T-cell populations, increased CD8(+) T-cell cytotoxicity and lower virus titres after challenge. Furthermore, CD8(+) memory T-cell function was increased following infection with vN1.I6E, with more IFNγ production and greater protection against VACV infection following passive transfer to naïve mice, compared to CD8(+) T-cells from mice infected with wild type virus (vN1.WT). This demonstrates the importance of NF-κB activation within infected cells for long-term CD8(+) T-cell memory and vaccine efficacy. Further, it provides a rationale for deleting N1 from VACV vectors to enhance CD8(+) T-cell immunogenicity, while simultaneously reducing virulence to improve vaccine safety. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 13 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2025.
All research outputs
#4,350,781
of 30,143,106 outputs
Outputs from Immunology
#352
of 2,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,410
of 284,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunology
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,143,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.