↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prospective daily diary study reporting of any and all symptoms in healthy adults in Pakistan: prevalence and response
Published in
BMJ Open, November 2017
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014998
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Prevalence of symptoms in everyday life and how people respond to these symptoms is little studied outside Western culture and developed countries. We sought to use modified diary methods to explore the prevalence of and responses to symptoms in Pakistan. Prospective daily survey of symptoms and response. 8 cities across four provinces in Pakistan. Stratified intercept in each city to recruit 153 participants of which 151 completed. Each day for 30 days, participants were prompted by text message (short message service (SMS)) to complete a symptom diary. On days where symptoms were experienced, participants also reported how they responded. Prevalence was adjusted to population age and gender distributions. 92% of participants experienced symptoms (adjusted prevalence 94%, 95% CI 91% to 97%), with musculoskeletal pain (83%, adj. 84%, 95% CI 84% to 90%) and respiratory symptoms (75%, adj. 77%, 95% CI 71% to 84%) the most prevalent types of symptoms. Self-medication and use of home remedies and traditional medicines were the most common responses. Seeking professional help or using conventional medicine were less common, and self-medication responses included the use of antibiotics without prescription. The range of home remedies and traditional medicines was very diverse. While symptom experience in Pakistan was similar to Western countries, home remedies were much more frequently used to respond to symptoms. Understanding how people respond and manage their experience of symptoms outside formal healthcare is important for designing effective policy and interventions, and this needs to be understood within the broader context including the cultural and economic setting, the health system and other structural determinants of health.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 36 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Psychology 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 40 49%