↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of simple geochemical indicators of aeolian sand provenance: Late Quaternary dune fields of North America revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary Science Reviews, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of simple geochemical indicators of aeolian sand provenance: Late Quaternary dune fields of North America revisited
Published in
Quaternary Science Reviews, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.07.007
Authors

Daniel R. Muhs

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Professor 3 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 51%
Environmental Science 5 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#3,346
of 3,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,382
of 324,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#51
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.