↓ Skip to main content

Composition, Roles, and Regulation of Cullin-Based Ubiquitin E3 Ligases

Overview of attention for article published in The Arabidopsis Book / American Society of Plant Biologists, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Composition, Roles, and Regulation of Cullin-Based Ubiquitin E3 Ligases
Published in
The Arabidopsis Book / American Society of Plant Biologists, November 2014
DOI 10.1199/tab.0175
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Due to their sessile nature, plants depend on flexible regulatory systems that allow them to adequately regulate developmental and physiological processes in context with environmental cues. The ubiquitin proteasome pathway, which targets a great number of proteins for degradation, is cellular tool that provides the necessary flexibility to accomplish this task. Ubiquitin E3 ligases provide the needed specificity to the pathway by selectively binding to particular substrates and facilitating their ubiquitylation. The largest group of E3 ligases known in plants is represented by CULLIN-REALLY INTERESTING NEW GENE (RING) E3 ligases (CRLs). In recent years, a great amount of knowledge has been generated to reveal the critical roles of these enzymes across all aspects of plant life. This review provides an overview of the different classes of CRLs in plants, their specific complex compositions, the variety of biological processes they control, and the regulatory steps that can affect their activities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Kenya 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 23%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 18%
Chemistry 4 3%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#9,320,531
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from The Arabidopsis Book / American Society of Plant Biologists
#39
of 87 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,936
of 420,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Arabidopsis Book / American Society of Plant Biologists
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them