↓ Skip to main content

The potential of chironomid larvae-based metrics in the bioassessment of non-wadeable rivers

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The potential of chironomid larvae-based metrics in the bioassessment of non-wadeable rivers
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.262
Pubmed ID
Authors

Djuradj Milošević, Dejan Mančev, Dubravka Čerba, Milica Stojković Piperac, Nataša Popović, Ana Atanacković, Jelena Đuknić, Vladica Simić, Momir Paunović

Abstract

The chironomid community in non-wadeable lotic systems was tested as a source of information in the construction of biological metrics which could be used into the bioassessment protocols of large rivers. In order to achieve this, we simultaneously patterned the chironomid community structure and environmental factors along the catchment of the Danube and Sava River. The Self organizing map (SOM) recognized and visualized three different structural types of chironomid community for different environmental properties, described by means of 7 significant abiotic factors (a multi-stressor gradient). Indicator species analysis revealed that the chironomid taxa most responsible for structural changes significantly varied in their abundance and frequency along the established environmental gradients. Out of 40 biological metrics based on the chironomid community, the multilayer perceptron (MLP), an supervised type of artificial neural network, derived 5 models in which the abundance of Paratrichocladius rufiventis, Orthocladiinae, Cricotopus spp., Cricotopus triannulatus agg. and Cricotopus/Orthocladius ratio achieved a significant relationship (the r Pearson's linear correlation coefficient>0.7) with the multi stressor environment. The sensitivity analysis "partial derivatives" (PaD) method showed that all 5 biological metrics within the multi-stressor gradient were mostly influenced by dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Despite short and monotonous environmental gradients and the absence of reference conditions, the chironomid community structure and biological metrics predictably changed along the multistress range, showing a great potential for the bioassessment of large rivers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 27%
Environmental Science 7 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,408,360
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#19,386
of 29,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,573
of 343,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#360
of 557 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 557 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.