↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Integration of Medicare and Medicaid for dually eligible beneficiaries: A focus group study examining beneficiaries' early experiences in California's dual financial alignment demonstration
Published in
Disability and Health Journal, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.07.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In 2014 California implemented a federal dual alignment demonstration that used a capitated managed care health plans called Cal MediConnect (CMC) to integrate medical care and long term services and supports (LTSS) for beneficiaries with both Medicare and Medicaid. These beneficiaries often have complex care needs, including multiple chronic conditions and disabilities. By 2016, 120,000 eligible beneficiaries were enrolled in the program. Focus groups with enrolled beneficiaries were conducted to gather rich data about their early experiences with quality of care, access to care, and coordination of care in CMC plans and to identify recommendations for program improvement. Evaluators conducted 14 focus groups with 104 beneficiaries enrolled in CMC plans in 6 demonstration counties. The passive enrollment process did not provide adequate information about certain aspects of CMC, leaving many beneficiaries unaware of new benefits such as care coordination, transportation, and managed LTSS. Most beneficiaries who were using the CMC care coordination benefit reported increased access to specialty care, medical equipment, and other LTSS. Changing providers and having trouble with authorization for specialty services, prescriptions, or medical equipment were common reasons for dissatisfaction. Many beneficiaries reported that early disruptions in care due to the transition of delivery system improved with time. Similar to other studies that examine beneficiaries' experiences with delivery system change, participants were confused about the passive enrollment process and demonstrated a lack of understanding of many aspects of Cal MediConnect. Analysis identified areas where beneficiaries noted improvement in their quality of care, access, and coordination of care, but also areas for improvement. Streamlining the authorization processes and extending continuity of care provisions would improve access to providers. Increasing beneficiaries' awareness of CMC plans' role in LTSS is key to improving their access to home- and community-based services.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 29 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Psychology 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 35 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,332,808
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Disability and Health Journal
#165
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,412
of 352,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Disability and Health Journal
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.