↓ Skip to main content

Incidence of infective endocarditis in England, 2000–13: a secular trend, interrupted time-series analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
469 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Incidence of infective endocarditis in England, 2000–13: a secular trend, interrupted time-series analysis
Published in
The Lancet, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62007-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 144 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 469 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 461 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 62 13%
Student > Bachelor 54 12%
Other 46 10%
Student > Master 43 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 7%
Other 102 22%
Unknown 127 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 245 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 1%
Other 38 8%
Unknown 138 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 242. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2026.
All research outputs
#196,492
of 34,631,266 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#2,244
of 52,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,662
of 427,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#19
of 548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,631,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.