↓ Skip to main content

The sleepwake cycle and Alzheimer's disease: what do we know?

Overview of attention for article published in Neurodegenerative Disease Management, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 459)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
5 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The sleepwake cycle and Alzheimer's disease: what do we know?
Published in
Neurodegenerative Disease Management, November 2014
DOI 10.2217/nmt.14.33
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

SUMMARY  Sleep-wake disturbances are a highly prevalent and often disabling feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD). A cardinal feature of AD includes the formation of amyloid plaques, associated with the extracellular accumulation of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide. Evidence from animal and human studies suggests that Aβ pathology may disrupt the sleep-wake cycle, in that as Aβ accumulates, more sleep-wake fragmentation develops. Furthermore, recent research in animal and human studies suggests that the sleep-wake cycle itself may influence Alzheimer's disease onset and progression. Chronic sleep deprivation increases amyloid plaque deposition, and sleep extension results in fewer plaques in experimental models. In this review geared towards the practicing clinician, we discuss possible mechanisms underlying the reciprocal relationship between the sleep-wake cycle and AD pathology and behavior, and present current approaches to therapy for sleep disorders in AD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 297 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 15%
Researcher 39 13%
Student > Master 21 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 87 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 58 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 8%
Psychology 17 6%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 95 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,161,450
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Neurodegenerative Disease Management
#43
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,428
of 423,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurodegenerative Disease Management
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.