↓ Skip to main content

Nurse staffing and quality of care in UK general practice: cross-sectional study using routinely collected data

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nurse staffing and quality of care in UK general practice: cross-sectional study using routinely collected data
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, January 2010
DOI 10.3399/bjgp10x482086
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In many UK general practices, nurses have been used to deliver results against the indicators of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), a 'pay for performance' scheme.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 4%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 98 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 21%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 24 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 25%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,089,905
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,116
of 5,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,288
of 234,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.