You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Emergence of the discourse about “sportification of judo” during the process leading to establishment of the Four Imperial Universities Competition and its historic significance, focusing on the relationship between “student judo” and Kōdōkan judo from 1918 to 1928
|
---|---|
Published in |
Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences), January 2014
|
DOI | 10.5432/jjpehss.13097 |
Authors |
Tetsuya Nakajima |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2015.
All research outputs
#14,784,639
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences)
#111
of 299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,525
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences)
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 299 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.