↓ Skip to main content

The characterization of iron (III) in seawater and related toxicity to early life stages of scleractinian corals

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The characterization of iron (III) in seawater and related toxicity to early life stages of scleractinian corals
Published in
Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, November 2017
DOI 10.1002/etc.4043
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Currently toxicity data for iron (Fe) in seawater is limited; furthermore these data are of poor quality due to the importance of Fe solubility in test solutions being overlooked. This study characterised the solubility and lability of Fe(III) in seawater and then examined the effects of Fe(III) on the fertilisation success and larval survival of the tropical marine scleractinian corals Acropora spathulata and Platygyra daedalea. Here we present the first assessment of the effects of Fe on the early life stages of scleractinian corals. Concentrations of both soluble and labile forms of Fe were very low with dissolved Fe concentrations ≤ 0.195 mg/L in bioassay test solutions and chemical determinations revealing labile Fe concentrations ≤ 1.21 mg/L. For fertilisation experiments the EC50 value for total Fe was 25 mg/L for the most sensitive species P. daedalea, whilst the EC50 values for A. spathulata ranged between 40 to 66 mg/L. The LC50 value for P. daedalea larval survival was 47 mg/L Fe after 72 h exposure. Here we provide Fe toxicity data for tropical marine keystone species that could be used to help generate more reliable guideline values for Fe in marine waters. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Other 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 13 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2017.
All research outputs
#23,000,123
of 34,020,007 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#5,174
of 6,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,833
of 485,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#45
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,020,007 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.