↓ Skip to main content

Unmet diagnostic needs in infectious disease

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Unmet diagnostic needs in infectious disease
Published in
Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.10.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Accurate diagnosis is critical to providing appropriate care in infectious diseases (ID). New technologies for infectious disease diagnostics are emerging, but gaps remain in test development and availability. The Emerging Infections Network surveyed ID physicians to assess unmet diagnostic needs. Responses reflected the urgent need to identify drug-resistant infections and highlighted the potential for early diagnosis to improve antibiotic stewardship. Information gained from this survey can help inform recommendations for new diagnostic test development in the future.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Ireland 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Researcher 12 19%
Other 9 14%
Student > Master 6 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 3%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Chemistry 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,191,178
of 33,940,276 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease
#58
of 3,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,994
of 304,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,940,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.