↓ Skip to main content

Succinate Dehydrogenase is the Regulator of Respiration in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Pathogens, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Succinate Dehydrogenase is the Regulator of Respiration in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Published in
PLoS Pathogens, November 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004510
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In chronic infection, Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli are thought to enter a metabolic program that provides sufficient energy for maintenance of the protonmotive force, but is insufficient to meet the demands of cellular growth. We sought to understand this metabolic downshift genetically by targeting succinate dehydrogenase, the enzyme which couples the growth processes controlled by the TCA cycle with the energy production resulting from the electron transport chain. M. tuberculosis contains two operons which are predicted to encode succinate dehydrogenase enzymes (sdh-1 and sdh-2); we found that deletion of Sdh1 contributes to an inability to survive long term stationary phase. Stable isotope labeling and mass spectrometry revealed that Sdh1 functions as a succinate dehydrogenase during aerobic growth, and that Sdh2 is dispensable for this catalysis, but partially overlapping activities ensure that the loss of one enzyme can incompletely compensate for loss of the other. Deletion of Sdh1 disturbs the rate of respiration via the mycobacterial electron transport chain, resulting in an increased proportion of reduced electron carrier (menaquinol) which leads to increased oxygen consumption. The loss of respiratory control leads to an inability to recover from stationary phase. We propose a model in which succinate dehydrogenase is a governor of cellular respiration in the adaptation to low oxygen environments.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 144 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 18%
Student > Master 20 14%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 45 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 9%
Chemistry 7 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 47 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2014.
All research outputs
#22,371,254
of 27,372,766 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Pathogens
#9,032
of 9,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,240
of 376,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Pathogens
#120
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,372,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.