↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Subtype‐specific effects of dopaminergic D2 receptor activation on synaptic trains in layer V pyramidal neurons in the mouse prefrontal cortex
Published in
Physiological Reports, November 2017
DOI 10.14814/phy2.13499
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In humans, prefrontal cortical areas are known to support executive functions. In mice, these functions are mediated by homologous regions in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Executive processes are critically dependent on optimal levels of dopamine (DA), but the cellular mechanisms of DA modulation are incompletely understood. Stable patterns of neuronal activity may be sensitive to frequency-dependent changes in synaptic transmission. We characterized the effects of D2 receptor (D2R) activation on short-term excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) dynamics evoked at varying frequencies in the two subtypes of layer V pyramidal neurons in mouse mPFC We isolated NMDA receptor and non-NMDA receptor-mediated components of EPSP trains evoked by stimulating fibers within layer V or layer I. All significant effects of D2 receptor activation were confined to type I (corticopontine) cells. First, we found that with layer I stimulation, D2R activation reduces the amplitude of NMDAR-mediated EPSPs, with no effect on facilitation or depression of these responses at lower frequencies, but leading to facilitation with high frequency stimulation. Further, the non-NMDA component also underwent synaptic depression at low frequencies. Second, with layer V stimulation, D2R activation had no effect on NMDA or non-NMDA receptor-mediated EPSP components. Overall, our results suggest that D2R activation may modulate memory functions by inhibiting 'top-down' influences from apical tuft inputs activated at low frequencies, while promoting 'top-down' influences from inputs activated at higher frequencies. These data provide further insight into mechanisms of dopamine's modulation of executive functions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Student > Bachelor 5 18%
Student > Master 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 29%
Psychology 5 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2017.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Physiological Reports
#2,112
of 2,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,480
of 438,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiological Reports
#58
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.