↓ Skip to main content

Stem Cells Rejuvenate Radiation-Impaired Vasculogenesis in Murine Distraction Osteogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Stem Cells Rejuvenate Radiation-Impaired Vasculogenesis in Murine Distraction Osteogenesis
Published in
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, March 2015
DOI 10.1097/prs.0000000000001024
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Radiotherapy is known to be detrimental to bone and soft tissue repair, resulting in a high incidence of devastating wound healing complications by means of cellular and vascular depletion. Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) have been shown to enhance bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis (DO) following radiation (XRT). We posit that transplanted BMSCswill significantly augment the mandibular vascularity devastated by XRT therapy as determined by stereological outcome metrics.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 19%
Other 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 56%
Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Energy 1 4%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,757,238
of 27,623,165 outputs
Outputs from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#7,336
of 10,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,419
of 273,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#108
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,623,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.