↓ Skip to main content

Open-access community child health clinics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child Health Care, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Open-access community child health clinics
Published in
Journal of Child Health Care, January 2012
DOI 10.1177/1367493511419874
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In Australia, Community Child Health Services (CCHS) is the primary health care service which seeks to strengthen and support families, prevent illness and manage risks. Several nursing models of care exist within CCHS, and limited research has investigated which is the best way to provide child health surveillance and parenting support during the early years. This study qualitatively explored the everyday lived experience of parents and child health nurses involved with an open-access (appointment-free, parent-led) group child health surveillance clinic. Findings showed that participants considered the open-access clinic provided a helpful and supportive way of delivering child health surveillance and parental support to families with infants aged 0-18 months, without identified risk factors. The perspectives of multiple parents, nurses and other health workers found it effective, flexible and parent-directed, which may be in contrast to some traditional individual appointment child health surveillance methods.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 19 24%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Librarian 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 34 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Psychology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 22 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,310,749
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child Health Care
#483
of 603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,077
of 243,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child Health Care
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.