↓ Skip to main content

Epithelial rotation promotes the global alignment of contractile actin bundles during Drosophila egg chamber elongation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Epithelial rotation promotes the global alignment of contractile actin bundles during Drosophila egg chamber elongation
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms6511
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tissues use numerous mechanisms to change shape during development. The Drosophila egg chamber is an organ-like structure that elongates to form an elliptical egg. During elongation the follicular epithelial cells undergo a collective migration that causes the egg chamber to rotate within its surrounding basement membrane. Rotation coincides with the formation of a 'molecular corset', in which actin bundles in the epithelium and fibrils in the basement membrane are all aligned perpendicular to the elongation axis. Here we show that rotation plays a critical role in building the actin-based component of the corset. Rotation begins shortly after egg chamber formation and requires lamellipodial protrusions at each follicle cell's leading edge. During early stages, rotation is necessary for tissue-level actin bundle alignment, but it becomes dispensable after the basement membrane is polarized. This work highlights how collective cell migration can be used to build a polarized tissue organization for organ morphogenesis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 211 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 21%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 66 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 26%
Physics and Astronomy 17 8%
Engineering 11 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 50 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#17,835,756
of 27,754,590 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#56,187
of 66,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,697
of 377,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#554
of 692 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,754,590 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 692 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.