↓ Skip to main content

Save-a-life at the ballpark: 10-min spectator training achieves proficiency in cardiac arrest response

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Save-a-life at the ballpark: 10-min spectator training achieves proficiency in cardiac arrest response
Published in
Resuscitation, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.10.023
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine immediate recall, feasibility, and efficiency of a brief out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) bystander response training session at a large sporting event. We introduce two new measures of efficiency for training: (i) cardiac arrest training yield (CATY), i.e., number trained/number of spectators, and (ii) the training efficiency index for cardiac arrest (TEICA), i.e., persons trained per volunteer hours.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 53 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 26 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Engineering 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 29 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,815,737
of 33,205,760 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#1,119
of 6,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,082
of 412,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#19
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,205,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.