↓ Skip to main content

Inverting Steric Effects: Using “Attractive” Noncovalent Interactions To Direct Silver-Catalyzed Nitrene Transfer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inverting Steric Effects: Using “Attractive” Noncovalent Interactions To Direct Silver-Catalyzed Nitrene Transfer
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, November 2017
DOI 10.1021/jacs.7b07619
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Nitrene transfer (NT) reactions represent a powerful, direct method to convert C-H bonds into amine groups that are prevalent in numerous commodity chemicals and pharmaceuticals. Indeed, the importance of the C-N bond has stimulated the development of an array of transition-metal complexes to effect regio- and diastereoselective NT. Steric and electronic control is often invoked to explain the observed outcome in these reactions, but the details of the exact interactions that control selectivity are often unclear. We have found that silver-catalyzed NT reactions provide a convenient platform to better understand how the interplay of catalyst and substrate structure impact the site-selectivity of C-H amination. In this work, we explore the underlying reasons why Ag(tpa)OTf (tpa = tris(pyridylmethyl)amine) prefers to activate α-conjugated C-H bonds over 3° alkyl C(sp3)-H bonds and apply these insights to both reaction optimization and catalyst design. Experimental results suggest possible roles of non-covalent interactions (NCIs) in directing the NT; computational studies support the involvement of π···π and Ag···π interactions between the catalyst and substrate, primarily by lowering the energy of the directed transition state and reaction conformers. In addition, a simple Hess's law relationship can be employed to predict selectivities for new substrates containing competing NCIs. The insights presented herein are poised to inspire the design of other catalyst-controlled C-H functionalization reactions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Professor 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 31 66%
Engineering 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,452,930
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#60,453
of 62,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#372,435
of 437,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#490
of 539 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 539 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.