↓ Skip to main content

Fungal Phylogenetics and Phylogenomics

Overview of attention for book
Fungal Phylogenetics and Phylogenomics
Academic Press
Attention for Chapter: Advances in Fungal Phylogenomics and Their Impact on Fungal Systematics. - PubMed - NCBI
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Chapter title
Advances in Fungal Phylogenomics and Their Impact on Fungal Systematics. - PubMed - NCBI
Book title
Fungal Phylogenetics and Phylogenomics
Published in
Advances in genetics, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/bs.adgen.2017.09.004
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-12-813261-6
Authors

Zhang, Ning, Luo, Jing, Bhattacharya, Debashish, Ning Zhang, Jing Luo, Debashish Bhattacharya

Abstract

In the past decade, advances in next-generation sequencing technologies and bioinformatic pipelines for phylogenomic analysis have led to remarkable progress in fungal systematics and taxonomy. A number of long-standing questions have been addressed using comparative analysis of genome sequence data, resulting in robust multigene phylogenies. These have added to, and often surpassed traditional morphology or single-gene phylogenetic methods. In this chapter, we provide a brief history of fungal systematics and highlight some examples to demonstrate the impact of phylogenomics on this field. We conclude by discussing some of the challenges and promises in fungal biology posed by the ongoing genomics revolution.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 31 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 36 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,477,223
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Advances in genetics
#101
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,673
of 423,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in genetics
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.