You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Studies on Taste of Tricholomic Acid and Ibotenic Acid (Part 1)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi, January 1965
|
| DOI | 10.4327/jsnfs1949.18.172 |
| Authors |
Mamoru Terasaki, Eiichiro Fujita, Shôzo Wada, Tsunematsu Takemoto, Tadashi Nakajima, Tetsuro Yokobe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi
#73
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#895
of 10,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.