↓ Skip to main content

Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element
Published in
Nature, October 1993
DOI 10.1038/365520a0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The three-dimensional structure of a TATA-box binding polypeptide complexed with the TATA element of the adenovirus major late promoter has been determined by X-ray crystallography at 2.25 A resolution. Binding of the saddle-shaped protein induces a conformational change in the DNA, inducing sharp kinks at either end of the sequence TATAAAAG. Between the kinks, the right-handed double helix is smoothly curved and partially unwound, presenting a widened minor groove to TBP's concave, antiparallel beta-sheet. Side-chain/base interactions are restricted to the minor groove, and include hydrogen bonds, van der Waals contacts and phenylalanine-base stacking interactions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 244 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 26%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Master 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Professor 19 7%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 47 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 78 31%
Chemistry 19 7%
Physics and Astronomy 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 50 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2025.
All research outputs
#4,979,524
of 33,729,289 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#64,174
of 116,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,535
of 28,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#58
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,729,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 96.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.