↓ Skip to main content

Support for Indoor Bans on Electronic Cigarettes among Current and Former Smokers

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Support for Indoor Bans on Electronic Cigarettes among Current and Former Smokers
Published in
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, November 2014
DOI 10.3390/ijerph111212174
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is increasing in the U.S. Although marketed as a safer alternative for cigarettes, initial evidence suggests that e-cigarettes may pose a secondhand exposure risk. The current study explored the prevalence and correlates of support for e-cigarette bans.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 88 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Researcher 14 15%
Other 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 26 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Psychology 8 9%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2018.
All research outputs
#10,896,100
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#14,784
of 35,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,448
of 422,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#59
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.