↓ Skip to main content

Effective antibacterials: at what cost? The economics of antibacterial resistance and its control

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effective antibacterials: at what cost? The economics of antibacterial resistance and its control
Published in
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), June 2011
DOI 10.1093/jac/dkr260
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony R. White, on behalf of the BSAC Working Party on The Urgent Need: Regenerating Antibacterial Drug Discovery and Development, Martin Blaser, Otto Carrs, Gail Cassell, Neil Fishman, Robert Guidos, Stuart Levy, John Powers, Ragnar Norrby, Glenn Tillotson, Rick Davies, Steven Projan, Mike Dawson, Dominique Monnet, Marcus Keogh-Brown, Kieran Hand, Sarah Garner, David Findlay, Chantal Morel, Richard Wise, Richard Bax, Frances Burke, Ian Chopra, Lloyd Czaplewski, Roger Finch, David Livermore, Laura J. V. Piddock, Tony White

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 3%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 179 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Other 16 9%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 42 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 5%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 46 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,177,170
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#2,178
of 10,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,153
of 166,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#20
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.