↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cortical networks for auditory detection with and without informational masking: Task effects and implications for conscious perception
Published in
NeuroImage, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.036
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ambiguous and masked stimuli have been used to study conscious perception by comparing neural activity during different percepts of identical physical stimuli. One limitation of this approach is that it typically requires a reporting task that may engage neural processes beyond those required for conscious perception. Here, we explored potential fMRI correlates of auditory conscious perception with and without overt report. In experiment 1, regular tone patterns were presented as targets under informational masking, and participants reported their percepts on each trial. In experiment 2, regular tone patterns were presented without masking, while the uninformed participants (i) passively fixated, (ii) performed an orthogonal visual task, and (iii) reported trial-wise the presence of the auditory pattern as in experiment 1 (in fixed order). Under informational masking, target-pattern detection was associated with activity in auditory cortex, superior temporal sulcus, and a distributed fronto-parieto-insular network. Unmasked and task-irrelevant tone patterns elicited activity that overlapped with the network observed under informational masking in auditory cortex, the right superior temporal sulcus, and the ventral precentral sulcus in an ROI analysis. We therefore consider these structures candidate regions for a neural substrate of auditory conscious perception. In contrast, activity in the intraparietal sulcus, insula, and dorsal precentral sulcus were only observed for unmasked tone patterns when they were task relevant. These areas therefore appear more closely related to task performance or top-down attention rather than auditory conscious perception, per se.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Student > Master 6 18%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 35%
Psychology 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#9,051
of 12,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,783
of 445,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#175
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.